- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
-
Approaching a stationary car: Left Offset
-
Approaching a stationary car: No Offset
-
Approaching a stationary car: Right Offset
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
- Not Available
-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
Seat Position | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Front | 2nd row | |||
Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
In the frontal offset test, good protection was provided to both the 6 and 10 year infants. Similarly, in the side barrier impact, all critical parts of the body were well protected for both dummies and the Mazda 3 scored maximum points for its performance for child protection in the dynamic tests. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the Mazda 3 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 18.6 Pts
Pelvis Impact 6.0 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
System Name | Smart Brake Support | ||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | ||
Operational From | 10 km/h | ||
PERFORMANCE | |
-
Approaching a crossing cyclist
-
Cyclist along the roadside
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good, and at least adequate over almost all of the surface. Protection of pedestrian's legs and of the pelvis area was good in all test areas and the Mazda 3 scored maximum points. The AEB system can detect vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists. In tests of these functionalities, the system demonstrated good performance for pedestrians and adequate performance in the more challenging cyclist scenarios.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
System Name | Speed Limit Sign Alert |
Speed Limit Information Function | Camera & Map |
Speed Control Function | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Applies To | Not available | ||
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
Occupant Detection | |||
|
System Name | Lane-Keep Assist System |
Type | LKA (including LDW) |
Operational From | 55 km/h |
Performance | |
Emergency Lane Keeping | |
Lane Keep Assist | |
Human Machine Interface |
System Name | Smart Brake Support | |||
Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operational From | 4 km/h | |||
Additional Information | Supplementary warning |
The 2019 Mazda 3 has a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats as standard. The AEB system performed well in tests of its functionality at highway speeds. The speed assistance system uses a camera and digital mapping to identify the local speed limit and offers the driver the opportunity to set the limiter appropriately. The lane support system assists in preventing the vehicle from drifting out of lane but does not intervene in more critical scenarios, as do the systems on some cars.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Mazda 3 2.0 petrol, LHD
Body Type - 5 door hatchback
Year Of Publication 2019
Kerb Weight 1346kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Mazda 3s
Class Small Family Car
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
- Not available
- Not applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Variants of Model Range
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
4 door saloon | 2.0 petrol | 4 x 2 | ||
4 door saloon | 1.8 diesel | 4 x 2 | ||
5 door hatchback | 2.0 petrol* | 4 x 2 | ||
5 door hatchback | 2.0 petrol | 4 x 4 | ||
5 door hatchback | 1.8 diesel | 4 x 2 |
* Tested variant
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment of the Mazda 3 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings showed good protection for all critical body regions of the passenger. Good protection was provided to the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Mazda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and those sitting in different positions. In the full-width, rigid barrier test, maximum points were scored for the front driver and rear passenger occupants, with good protection of all critical parts of the body. Similarly, in the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, all parts of the body were well protected and the car scored full points. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system, known as 'Smart Brake Support', performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries occur. Collisions were avoided in all test scenarios.